Three digit crystal ball number guesser plus#

The total market size for your new technology (Y) is therefore any refinery that currently doesn't meet EPA requirements plus any refinery that used technology X. You are convinced that a refinery that used technology X is as likely to buy your new technology (if you develop it) as a refinery that doesn't use any technology yet. Recently, a competing technology was brought in the market (technology X) that also helps refineries meet these emissions and quite a few refineries are already using this technology (before start of EPA requirements), but it is a lot more expensive. However, you only want to develop this technology further if there are at least 55 refineries in the US that could benefit from your technology. This stuff is tricky.You are an R&D company, that is planning to commercialize a new technology for oil refineries to help them meet a new EPA NOx emission requirements that will come into effect 1 year from now. Will schedule something when we're a bit more confident in our answers. uk/e/nutrient-neuвЂ¦ oneillhomerltd luhc Good idea. RT richardatpas: Events for councils with nutrient advice start on Thursday.

AnnaвЂ™s first conversation is withвЂ¦ /i/web/status/1вЂ¦ 4В weeksВ ago RT BeccyatPAS: I've got an article in LGAcomms first magazine: .uk/features/biodiвЂ¦ pas_team 3В weeksВ agoДЇancy a chat? Anna Rose in conversationвЂ¦ a new PAS venture with a personal touch.

Three digit crystal ball number guesser series#

Half-way through our initial workshop series some things are becoming clearвЂ¦ /i/web/status/1вЂ¦ 2В daysВ ago

Planning and вЂњnutrient neutralityвЂќ October 24, 2021.

DonвЂ™t be afraid to copy ideas from theВ past November 19, 2021.

What planning reform is going to leaveВ unchanged November 22, 2021.Bring the joy back into being a PlanningВ Officer January 24, 2022.LetвЂ™s get digital, digital вЂ“ how the planning sector is taking baby steps towards a digitised dreamВ destination February 23, 2022.Too many cases, and too many applicants unprepared to enter into the EoT rigmarole.ДЇollow Planning Advisory Service on Recent Posts

Dealing with designation on minors is not, and many councils at the bottom of table 153 are about to find out that they may have created an impossible mountain to climb.

The three quarters from Jan вЂ“ Sep 16 that youвЂ™ll need toВ forecastДealing with designation on majors is quite easy because there arenвЂ™t many of them.

The quarter from Oct-Dec 15 that you already know about but isnвЂ™t published.

The four published quarters of data from October 14 to Sept 15 ( DCLG live tables).

To make life easy, IвЂ™ve put together a little spreadsheet that allows you to bring together the three sets of data This, coupled with an estimate of when the new designation process will take place, allows councils to make a forecast of what their performance will be when designation for non-majors occurs. YouвЂ™ll have noticed that the epic consultation document last week included a question about the level at which the new criteria for designation on non-majors should be set. I have tried to publish this as a web document here Perhaps you can make a guess вЂ“ there are 9 councils below 60% вЂ“ does that feel about right ? Lastly, anticipating the question вЂњWhat is going to be the designation threshold for non-majors ?вЂќ we donвЂ™t know. There is at least one council that drops into the potential designation zone. Some councils will be pleasantly surprised, others will not. IвЂ™ve updated the designation crystal ball with the data published over the weekend (or very early this morning) from DCLG.ДЄgain, IвЂ™ve just discarded the quarter of data that I donвЂ™t think will count towards designation so you can play вЂњwhat if ?вЂќ. I keep saying it, but councils need to pay attention to quality! The latest stats, advice and downloads are in our designation khub over here.